Select Page

Thoughts on the Lokanath Swami Case, Amber


September 17, 2021

My personal view, shared by many, just so it has been expressed clearly for the record… I understand that 30 odd years have passed since Lokanath Swami touched a child between the legs, and in other inappropriate ways over the course of several days, and that there has been no known recurrence.

I understand that personal and spiritual growth, remorse and repentance, may have occurred during that time.

I understand that Krsna is very merciful and that as a benevolent society following in the footsteps of Mahaprabhu we should extend compassion to the fallen, conditioned souls.

I appreciate that as jivas we are all on the battlefield of material nature and our only hope is our continued pursuit of spiritual consciousness, and that that is perhaps the only real, unconditional entitlement we have.

I understand the cultural divide, and the political implications of a Zero Tolerance Policy inasmuch as it might imply further investigations, possible actions taken against offenders and perhaps the restructuring of our beloved Srila Prabhupada’s institution.

However, as a second generation devotee, a gurukuli, a survivor of sexual abuse… as a mother, as a friend and witness to the trauma of many who have survived, or are struggling to survive abuse while under the banner of ISKCON, as someone who still has to deal with the after-effects of abuse daily, knowing the full impact of such abuse… I find it disheartening that this issue is taken in light of the interests of the institution.

I find it disappointing that protection, lenience and preferential treatment are given based on status, political power and guru-ship as opposed to protecting and upholding the innocence and vulnerability of children. It inspires feelings of disgust, that child protection is under debate, that somehow lawful protection of children evades people’s conscience, that as an institution we fumble and falter, as if unsure where our responsibility lies, somehow withholding proper avenues of seeking redress.

The current case of Lokanath Swami is a catalyst for change. Those abused as children of Krsna in Prabhupada’s movement have grown to adulthood and have found their voice.

People who commit child abuse, past or present, should not hold a position of leadership, should not sit on the Vyasasana, should not be heralded as a saviour or be publicly honoured. There should be a mandate in place that stipulates a Zero Tolerance Policy for child abuse.

This is not an issue of laundering or stealing money, or visiting prostitutes, or having affairs with adults, or of manipulating or abusing adults under your guidance or command. Child abuse is the willful abuse of innocence, the utilisation of someone’s trust to satisfy personal curiosity, pleasure or gain.

Our children are our future. If we set a precedent of allowance we effectively make way for more abuse to take place under our watch, to be accepted as ok or neglectable.

To turn a blind eye, to shy away from moral responsibility, is to be complicit. If someone touched my child between the legs I would not be offering homage and neither would I affiliate myself with an institution that condones, excuses or ignores this kind of behaviour.

May Krsna forgive us our quandary, may He always shine in our hearts as the Absolute Truth, a shelter to all, and the ultimate goal and object of all sacrifice.

Thanks, AMBER

 558 total views,  1 views today

ISKCON Europe Upholds Ban on Lokanath

ISKCON Europe Upholds Ban on Lokanath

May 19, 2023Euro RGB Statement Regarding Lokanath Swami Status in EuropeHaving received feedback and requests from some members of our European devotee community, the Euro RGB body set forth to review and discuss the previous resolution made regarding Lokanath Swami...

Lokanath’s Lawsuit Against Child Protection Advocates

Lokanath’s Lawsuit Against Child Protection Advocates

Since April 2021, Damodara dasa (Australia) and Saraswati dasi (North America) have asked the ISKCON GBC to follow their child protection laws and remove confessed child molester Lokanath "Swami" from leadership within ISKCON.   On November 24, 2022, Lokanath's lawyer...

Lokanath Loophole

Lokanath Loophole

 The ISKCON Child Protection Office (CPO) offers a service that when a devotee comes to a temple, that temple can contact the CPO and say “Hey, x is planning to come to our temple. Do they have any CPO restrictions?” And the CPO can respond “X is clear” or “X has a...

ISKCON North America Bans Lokanath

ISKCON North America Bans Lokanath

North American Council NA GBC and Regional LeadersInternational Society for Krishna ConsciousnessFounder-Acharya His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada24 October 2022Statement:As per the recent GBC resolution stating "Lokanath Swami shall not initiate...

ISKCON Europe Upholds Ban on Lokanath

ISKCON Europe Bans Lokanath

Dear European Leaders,Please accept our humble obeisances.All glories to Srila Prabhupada!With this message, we like to inform you about the decision on H.H. Lokanatha Swami that was taken by the Euro RGB during the recent meeting in Radhadesha.Resolution...

Lokanath Loophole

Lokanath’s Admissions of Molesting a Child

These are a dozen confirmed instances between 1993 and 2017 when Lokanath admitted to his sexual abuse of a child.  This is a partial list as there have been other in-person conversations, phone calls, and correspondence where Lokanath talked about his sexual abuse of...

ISKCON North America Bans Lokanath

2022 GBC Resolution: Refraining from Interfering in Investigations

REFRAINING THE GBC FROM INTERVENING IN THE WORK OF VARIOUS ISKCON AGENCIES, OFFICES AND COMMITTEES Approved 20th JULY 2022WHEREAS the GBC Body (“GBC”) has created various ISKCON agencies, offices and committees to which it has delegated authority to deal with abuse of...

We ask the leadership of the Hare Krishna movement to set a clear and strong precedent for, and priority of, zero tolerance for child abuse – by handing Lokanath Swami’s child molestation case over to the ISKCON Child Protection Office.